Missing Ports range XnD44 - XnD48
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:15 am
Whilst getting my head around the port numbering and priorities etc for various chip packages I noticed a numbering oddity :
This is probably a stupid question and I have clearly missed something obvious but why aren't there ports covering the range XnD44 - XnD48?
And or why would it be numbered in that way :?
regards
Al
This is probably a stupid question and I have clearly missed something obvious but why aren't there ports covering the range XnD44 - XnD48?
And or why would it be numbered in that way :?
regards
Al