Just to let you know that the XS1-L1 processor has now been release in a 7mm x 7mm, 0.5mm pitch, 48 pin TQFP.
Please see: http://www.xmos.com/products/xs1-l-family/l1tq48
Cheers,
Corin
XS1-L1-48TQFP
-
Corin
- Experienced Member
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:38 pm
-
Folknology
- XCore Legend
- Posts: 1274
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:20 pm
Hey this is handy, strange I/O pinout choice but I guess that's for the USB folks..
Why using link C rather than Link A?
Nice to have a smaller package, any idea on pricing couldn't find them listed on distis yet
But cool, will have some fun with this
regards
Al
Why using link C rather than Link A?
Nice to have a smaller package, any idea on pricing couldn't find them listed on distis yet
But cool, will have some fun with this
regards
Al
Last edited by Folknology on Wed Apr 27, 2011 6:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Folknology
- XCore Legend
- Posts: 1274
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:20 pm
On the data sheet page 10 it refers to 'DEBUG_N' but this isn't actually present on the package?
I assume its just a typo/bad diagram rather than a pinout error?
regards
Al
I assume its just a typo/bad diagram rather than a pinout error?
regards
Al
-
segher
- XCore Expert
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:31 am
Because the link C pins aren't available in ULPI mode.Folknology wrote:Hey this is handy, strange I/O pinout choice but I guess that's for the USB folks..
Why using link C rather than Link A?
-
segher
- XCore Expert
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:31 am
The text refers to DEBUG_N as well. I suppose this is copy-pasta from the olderFolknology wrote:On the data sheet page 10 it refers to 'DEBUG_N' but this isn't actually present on the package?
I assume its just a typo/bad diagram rather than a pinout error?
documents (it is identical text).
-
Folknology
- XCore Legend
- Posts: 1274
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:20 pm
I presume you meant link A pins, but the link pins are available in ULPI mode, as links, just not as GPIO.Because the link C pins aren't available in ULPI mode.
I would have preferred a 4 bit port to 4 pins of the 32 bit port, but then I'm not a big USB user.
regards
Al
-
Folknology
- XCore Legend
- Posts: 1274
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:20 pm
I also notice the words 'MCU' and 'Microcontroller' are not used in the datasheet which is encouraging
There is another mention of DEBUG_N on page 8 which I also presume is a copy and paste mistake.
Is there anything we need to understand about this package's operation given the missing debug pin, i.e. does it have any knock on effects?
Also can the X0D52-55 pins be used in a select input without issues due to overlap on the 32bit port, especially if all the other GPIO pins are in use?
regards
Al
There is another mention of DEBUG_N on page 8 which I also presume is a copy and paste mistake.
Is there anything we need to understand about this package's operation given the missing debug pin, i.e. does it have any knock on effects?
Also can the X0D52-55 pins be used in a select input without issues due to overlap on the 32bit port, especially if all the other GPIO pins are in use?
regards
Al
-
segher
- XCore Expert
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:31 am
That one yes :-) P4BFolknology wrote:I presume you meant link A pins,
Yeah that's right I think. The docs (XS1-L hardware design checklist) suggestbut the link pins are available in ULPI mode, as links, just not as GPIO.
otherwise.
-
octal
- XCore Addict
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 3:30 pm
- Location: Argenteuil - France
Hi Corin,
Please what will be the price for these devices? and when will they be available (not listed on Digikey yet)?
Regards
Please what will be the price for these devices? and when will they be available (not listed on Digikey yet)?
Regards
-
ale500
- Respected Member
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:15 am
I think the price will be probably like the '64 part.